i’m pretty sure i first read The Unvanquished in high school. Most likely it was during my senior year at Castle Heights (1961-62). i’m guessing i started reading it in the library’s second floor stacks, sitting on the floor resting my back against the shelves. i experienced several wonderful, escaping-from-the-world reads up there like that, looking down on the lobby with study desks and the large one just beneath me where Major Hurd sat and ruled over the Rutherford Parks Library.
i think James Street’s The Biscuit Eater (1941) was the first one i read up there. The second was The Etruscan by Mika Waltari (1956). i believe i read both in one sitting each. The Etruscan may have taken two sittings. i was enthralled and thrilled with both.
Then, i picked out William Faulkner’s The Unvanquished. i began reading it up in those wonderful stacks, but had to check it out. i finished late that next early morning under my bedcovers with a flashlight and the small desk radio playing WCLA’s blues for the night.
It was my first experience with Faulkner. i was blown away. i don’t think my Heights’ English professors pointed me to it. Major Lindsey Donnell, freshman; Captain Robert Morgan, sophomore; Major Paul Wooten, junior; or the famed Major Tom Harris, senior all were capable of such a thing. i was always amazed at their ability not only to teach me English and literature, but making me think. Still, i don’t think they were responsible for my becoming an avid Faulkner fan.
It doesn’t matter. The Unvanquished gave me a depth of understanding as a great grandson of a Confederate soldier. The understanding and revelation of all aspects of the Civil War in the South took me into a place i had not grasped yet.
There are those who with no real understanding of humanity who will reject The Unvanquished as racist with hatred, not comprehending the complexity of many levels of the relationships between caucasians and negroes, poor freemen, and aristocracy of the South. Faulkner explores their humanity, their faults and their evil and their goodness.
In December 1967, i staying briefly with my friend John B. Johnson in New York City. Yanch was pursuing his joint masters in journalism and business. i was on Christmas leave from Navy OCS in Newport headed for two weeks back home in Lebanon. We were invited to a Christmas party by the parents of our good friends, Alan and Jim Hicks. Dr. Hicks and his wife were fixtures in NYC. The party was at their home on 95th and Park Avenue.
It was a gala affair. i enjoyed myself immensely, and as often, had a wee too much Tennessee whiskey. i found myself in a conversation with an erudite and nice gentleman in the middle of the living room. When he heard my accent, we wandered into a discussion of Faulkner and Robert Penn Warren. He asked me why i thought Southern writers wrote so well with deep feeling. i pondered for a few seconds and then replied.
i think writers in the South have a deep conflict within themselves about a wonderful society of pride and even goodness and the aberration of the inherent wrong of slavery. Dealing with the inhumanity of an institutional wrong and the humanity of each human within it, creates a culture inducing an environment of introspection. Or something like that. i’m sure nowhere near as in depth as my recall here.
He responded, “I always wonder about that. My best writers are from the South. We parted. Someone informed me that he was editor in chief of Newsweek. i still wish i had asked him for a job.
i think William Faulkner captured that anguish, that conflict of all thoughtful folks in the South in The Unvanquished. My reread had more of an impact, i think, on me, than the previous times i read it a long, long time ago.
i recommend it.